What if shakespeare had had a sister pdf




















All the conditions of her life, all her own instincts, were hostile to the state of mind which is needed to set free whatever is in the brain. But what is the state of mind that is most propitious to the act of creation, I asked? Can one come by any notion of the state that furthers and makes possible that strange activity? One gathers from this enormous modern literature of confession and self-analysis that to write a work of genius is almost always a feat of prodigious difficulty.

Generally material circumstances are against it. Dogs will bark; people will interrupt; money must be made; health will break down. It does not ask people to write poems and novels and histories; it does not need them. It does not care whether Flaubert finds the right word or whether Carlyle scrupulously verifies this or that fact. Naturally, it will not pay for what it does not want.

And so the writer, Keats, Flaubert, Carlyle, suffers, especially in the creative years of youth, every form of distraction and discouragement. A curse, a cry of agony, rises from those books of analysis and confession.

If anything comes through in spite of all this, it is a miracle, and probably no book is born entire and uncrippled as it was conceived. But for women, I thought, looking at the empty shelves, these difficulties were infinitely more formidable. In the first place, to have a room of her own, let alone a quiet room or a sound-proof room, was out of the question, unless her parents were exceptionally rich or very noble, even up to the beginning of the nineteenth century.

Such material difficulties were formidable; but much worse were the immaterial. The indifference of the world which Keats and Flaubert and other men of genius have found so hard to bear was in her case not indifference but hostility.

The world did not say to her as it said to them, Write if you choose; it makes no difference to me. The world said with a guffaw, Write? Juliet wants to do the right thing, which is doing what makes her happy. Women in the Merchant of Venice go against their gender roles. Men did not think that women could ever be as smart as they were, and did not listen or take advice from women that is why Portia had to dress up as a man just to get the men to listen to her and Antonio was saved just because of her intelligence.

Here is revealed the idea of love that women can do everything to see their husbands happy. Jessica also goes against the gender role of women, because she is making her own decision about her life. The two different protagonists were married and seem to lose their. Not being able to live up to what the North had in mind for white womanhood, meant that she was deemed unworthy of happiness just for the fact she tried to free herself by giving up her virtue.

Linda Brent was also prevented from the high expectations of preserving her purity due to Dr. Flint pressuring her countless times. Kate Chopin is an American writer known for her deception of impacts, the restricted view of the nineteenth-century society, had on women. Women did not have a voice of their own. They were trained to believe that the goal of their life is to serve their husband.

In the 19th century, the misogynist standards left women in a state where their potential was suppressed. She herself had been a victim of these standards causing depression and her journey to not rely on another man shaped her feminist attitude.

In , she wrote a piece entitled The Yellow Wallpaper where she unravels the destruction anti-feminist attitudes can cause. The Story of an Hour? Kate Chopin, as a writer, is well known for her literature work about the limited perception that the nineteenth-century society had on the female gender.

During that time, people were very restrictive about the views of a woman? Furthermore, women of that era did not have voice of their own. They were made to believe that their role in the society was to serve their husbands. In the society they lived in, women were halted to explore and fulfill their talent the same way men were able to, due to the gender role conventions that prevailed during this era.

Through a theoretical setting in which it is it is imagined that William Shakespeare had a sister Judith , Virginia Woolf personifies women during the sixteenth century in order to reflect the hardships they had to overcome as aspiring writers. Woolf then provides the reader with a hypothetical situation to ponder on: What if Shakespeare had had a sister — that is, a female sibling of.

Show More.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000